Get the E-newsletter
In 2011, healthcare provider Banner Health partnered with its employed physician group as well as independent physicians to form Banner Health Network (BHN). Along with 31 other participants, the organization joined the Pioneer Accountable Care Organization (ACO) program.
Started by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) and designed for health systems with experience coordinating care in this capacity, the Pioneer ACO model engages participants in exploring alternative payment models (APMs) to deliver higher-quality care along with Medicare savings. ACOs that reach designated cost and quality benchmarks share in the savings, while those that exceed their cost benchmark may owe money back to Medicare. Participants are evaluated in a total of 34 quality measures spanning four categories: patient/caregiver experience, care coordination/patient safety, preventive health, and at-risk population.
By 2015, the fourth performance year, all but 12 ACOs had dropped out of the Pioneer program. BHN finished with an overall quality score of 95.23 percent, exceeding the average performance by about three percentage points. It also reached the highest total savings for '15, with $35,113,328, thus earning $24,578,369 in shared shavings.
The ACO credits a substantial portion of its high performance to a team approach, including organization-wide buy-in.
"From the first year that we were in this program, our performance on the ACO quality measures was a system-wide strategic initiative," says Lisa Stevens Anderson, vice president and CEO of BHN. "All 48,000 of our employees across Banner Health are aligned on the same strategic initiatives, and our entire organization was focused on the performance of this initiative."
BHN in 2015 achieved a 100 percent quality rating in both care coordination/patient safety and preventive health. Comprising 5,000 providers, 13 hospitals, a cancer center, a children's medical center, and a range of clinical services, BHN has focused on alignment across its network. In addition, the ACO has reduced clinical variation and lowered costs through tactics including utilization of Medicare programs, provider and patient education, and investment in technology.
Success in the care coordination/patient safety area, which spans 10 ratings categories that include the skilled nursing facility (SNF) 30-day all-cause readmission measure (ACO-35), stems from approaches such as post-acute support and value-based payment opportunities for partner providers. "CMS [the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] and CMMI have given us some tools that have allowed us to engage with some providers in ways we weren't previously allowed to," Stevens Anderson notes.
Applying for a waiver to the three-day SNF rule has permitted BHN providers to send Medicare beneficiaries directly to a SNF if they determine an inpatient setting isn't necessary. In addition to eliminating a coinsurance payment for the beneficiary's inpatient stay and improving care quality, this tactic allows the hospital to avoid incurring the cost of a three-day stay.
BHN has also engaged SNF, home health, and hospice providers in quality performance metrics by utilizing a population-based payment option that CMMI provided for Pioneer ACOs to test. Providers accept a slight reduction in Medicare payments for the opportunity to earn additional revenue based on performance. BHN saw a decrease in the number and average length of SNF stays for its Medicare population, and attributed the reduction to improved coordination across its provider network.
Using quality-based incentives to reduce unnecessary hospital stays enhanced BHN's ability to coordinate care while improving admission and readmission rates. "From a physician's perspective, I strongly believe that quality and cost are two sides of same coin," says Robert Groves, MD, vice president of health management and chief medical officer, BHN. "The real magic is in getting barriers out of the way of physicians and other providers so that they can do the things that they know need to be done."
Compared with previous performance years, BHN in 2015 saw significant improvement in risk-standardized, all-condition readmissions (ACO-8), admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma (AHRQ Prevention Quality Indicator [PQI] #5; ACO-9), and admissions for heart failure (AHRQ PQI #8; ACO-10).
In preventive health, which contains eight categories, BHN achieved notable improvement in influenza immunization (ACO-14), body-mass index screening and follow-up (ACO-16), breast cancer screening (ACO-20), and documentation of screening for high blood pressure and follow-up (ACO-21).
Major improvement in those seven categories across care coordination/patient safety and preventive health further strengthened BHN's overall quality rating. The ACO has allocated resources to educating physicians during monthly provider engagement meetings, including discussion of measures and other requirements for documentation, and incorporating these measures into its primary care physician incentive scorecard. BHN has also found value in sending direct-mail postcards to members to emphasize the importance of flu vaccinations.
"Putting efforts into these areas pays off," says Kathleen Harris, senior director of government operations at BHN. "You've got patients who are healthier and happier and doctors who are giving better attention to preventive care and engagement for at-risk patients—and the higher the quality score, the higher the opportunity for earned savings."
To support high performance across its delivery system, BHN has invested in technology, including electronic health records (EHRs). It also uses an in-house tool called Clinical Performance Tracker to aggregate EHR and claims information to help pinpoint any care gaps. The organization plans to transition in mid-2017 to a tool that will have the capacity to integrate electronic records with its community physician practices.
Groves stresses the importance of maintaining "focus on quality in addition to sustainability—focus on having really good information to drive changes that will improve the opportunity to get our patients healthier in a more efficient way."
Investment in technology and personnel contributed to BHN's high performance but presented challenges along the way, and although the organization's overall quality score exceeded the mean in 2015, BHN notes continued opportunities for improvement. The organization has addressed these areas by continuously focusing on alignment, updating technology, and educating patients.
BHN has faced challenges in aligning physicians on a single EHR. Approximately 40 percent of the organization's participating primary care physicians in 2017 will use a nonaligned product. BHN will continue its efforts to streamline the number of EHRs used by its ACO providers.
"It has been an evolution working with our physicians to update their workflow to accommodate different measurements," Groves says. "We continually refer to the value-based 'journey' because we are on a constant learning curve and believe that the organization that can keep evolving will be the one that continues to be successful."
BHN's quality score was 87.5 percent in 2015 in the at-risk population quality category, which includes eight measures ranging from depression remission at 12 months (ACO-40) to controlling high blood pressure (ACO-28). This result was a drop-off from BHN's 2014 score of 92.5 percent, with the decrease stemming from factors that included BHN's performance in the drug management of coronary artery disease.
"The more information an engaged patient has about their care, including necessary medication and why each drug is important, the more likely they are to use their medicines reliably and consistently," Groves says. "Our teams of clinicians and coordinators try to bridge that knowledge gap with every encounter."
The patient/caregiver experience category, as measured by the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey, includes eight categories. Among them are getting timely care, appointments, and information (ACO-1), patients' ratings of providers (ACO-3), and stewardship of patient resources (ACO-34). Although BHN did not reach a 100 percent score, its tally of 93.44 percent was up significantly from 81.5 percent two years earlier. The organization credited this improvement to its continued investment of time and resources in the customer experience.
"Health care is a hard system to navigate," Stevens Anderson says, "and so we do have concentrated efforts to connect more information to our beneficiaries, to our patients, at time of service to allow them to do more self-service along the way as well."
Banner Health has redesigned its main website to become more consumer-focused, with key functionalities including help with finding doctors, services, locations, and education and support opportunities; bill payment; and the opportunity to sign up for a free monthly consumer wellness newsletter. The main website houses the MyBanner patient portal, also recently redesigned to be more consumer-focused, with functions such as scheduling appointments; messaging providers; and viewing medical history, lab results, and visit summaries.
The ACO model requires participants to form value-based relationships with other payers. BHN has partnered with commercial insurers, including Aetna. BHN's accountable care collaboration with Aetna, known as Aetna Whole Health, began in 2011 and has resulted in total shared savings of more than $9.9 million for the Aetna Whole Health fully insured commercial membership. In 2015, overall medical costs were reduced by 11.5 percent compared with expected costs for the market, and the ACO generated more than $2.6 million in fully insured savings.
Prioritizing value over volume, the Aetna Whole Health collaboration involves a risk-sharing agreement in which BHN earns compensation based on meeting set quality measures, including reduced hospital readmission rates, percentage of Aetna members receiving recommended preventive care and screenings, and increased access to primary care physicians. Drawing from BHN's integrated delivery system and care management expertise as well as Aetna's health IT and health plan knowledge, Aetna Whole Health has aimed to lower costs for its members while providing more-coordinated care with a focus on wellness.
"It's an organizational commitment to the evolving healthcare workspace where it's more about managing a population than it is about maximizing fee-for-service reimbursement," says Tom Grote, market president of Aetna's Arizona Market. "And so it's having the cultural perspective throughout the organization about this evolving approach to health care."
The partnership has succeeded in enrolling employers such as Sun Health Senior Living, a 550-employee owner and operator of three active-destination retirement communities in Arizona. In July 2012, Sun Health Senior Living's previous carrier presented the company with an 11.6 percent premium increase, leaving fewer than half of eligible employees able to afford a plan.
To recruit and retain staff in a competitive market, Sun Health Senior Living looked to conserve costs while also retaining medical benefits, and enrolled in Aetna Whole Health. Compared with the other carrier's 2012 rate increase, the plan saved the company 10 percent on medical premiums and decreased employees' single-coverage rates by 50 percent. The plan provided employees access to services ranging from same-day sick appointments to appointment reminders to coordinated management of health conditions.
"We have demonstrated results in improved quality," Stevens Anderson says. "We've focused on the experience, improved cost, and grown memberships together tremendously."
Web Exclusive: Additional Banner Health initiatives in alternative payment models
Managing its Medicare population, BHN has demonstrated significant improvement in savings and quality since it began participating in the Pioneer ACO Model in 2012. Its aggregate and earned savings have increased by 83.9 percent, from $19,098,858 and $13,369,201, respectively, while its quality score has increased by about 33 percentage points. BHN completed its fifth year in the Pioneer ACO model on Dec. 31, with results expected in August.
BHN’s Performance History
"It's a team sport these days," Groves notes about BHN's performance. "It's impossible to get the kind of results we got without being able to engage everybody in driving toward an improved experience, in a more sustainable strategy that takes care of our patients."
BHN plans to build on key lessons from its ACO collaborations to deliver on the Triple Aim. With healthcare spending hitting $3.2 trillion in 2015, a year-over-year increase of 5.8 percent—the highest increase in eight years—BHN will continue to partner with CMS and commercial plans to explore ways to address these costs through APMs.
"The problem of rapidly rising costs is not easily solved and continues to be a problem," Groves says. "We remain determined to transform health care, and that means we've got to get much more efficient, much higher in quality, and more reliable in the delivery of that quality. This ACO opportunity with CMS was really an opportunity to test out a lot of our ideas and others in the country about what might work."
A member of Premier, a healthcare advocacy organization, BHN is closely watching for potential policy changes accompanying the new presidential administration. BHN would support opportunities to build on value-based approaches to health care in APMs, such as through further exploration of telemedicine and by better equipping beneficiaries to manage their overall health outcomes.
Building on its previous collaboration with commercial plans and drawing from its ACO experiences, BHN has launched a joint venture with Aetna, known as Banner | Aetna. The jointly owned health plan launches in 2017 and promotes 100 percent alignment and financial accountability in support of higher-quality, effective care delivery that leads to decreased premiums for customers.
Among the goals of Banner | Aetna is providing user-friendly technology to its customers, including by connecting Aetna's member site with BHN's patient portal so members can locate information about their health care and plan. The collaboration will continue offering access to BHN's provider network and launch a 24-hour phone service managed by BHN nurses.
"We've been able to see BHN's strengths in the population health area through the ACO partnership, and we've been able to improve the health of the population while becoming more efficient in the way we deliver health care," Grote says.
BHN also is expanding its collaboration with CMS, having been accepted into Track 3 of the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) and been granted a waiver of the three-day SNF rule for 2017. Involving varying levels of savings and risk compared to the Pioneer ACO Model, the MSSP gives ACOs opportunities to take on responsibility for reducing healthcare costs and enhancing the quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries.
Embarking on these new collaborations, BHN plans to build on its previous experience, focusing on the team approach that has yielded substantial savings and better care quality. Says Stevens Anderson, "The alignment throughout the whole continuum has been the key to our success."
Elizabeth Barker is a digital communications professional and freelance writer in Chicago.
Interviewed for this article:
Lisa Stevens Anderson, vice president and CEO, BHN.
Groves, MD, vice president of health management and chief medical officer, BHN.
Kathleen Harris, senior
director of government operations, BHN.
Tom Grote, market president, Arizona
6 Patient Revenue Cycle Metrics You Should Be Tracking (and How to Improve Your Results)
Patient financial engagement is more challenging than ever – and more critical. With patient responsibility as a percentage of revenue on the rise, providers have seen their billing-related costs and accounts receivable levels increase. If increasing collection yield and reducing costs are a priority for your organization, the metrics outlined in this presentation will provide the framework you need to understand what’s working and what’s not, in order to guide your overall patient financial engagement initiatives and optimize results.
10 Ways to Reduce Patient Statement Volume (and Reduce Costs)
No two patients are the same. Each has a very personal healthcare experience, and each has distinct financial needs and preferences that have an impact on how, when and if they chose to pay their healthcare bill. It’s no longer effective to apply static billing techniques to solve the complex challenge of collecting balances from patients. The need to tailor financial conversations and payment options to individual needs and preferences is critical. This presentation provides 10 recommendations that will not only help you improve payment performance through a more tailored approach, but take control of rising collection costs.
Reduce Patient Balances Sent to Collection Agencies: Approaching New Problems with New Approaches
This white paper, written by Apex Vice President of Solutions and Services, Carrie Romandine, discusses the importance of patient segmentation and messaging specifically related to the patient revenue cycle. Applying strategic messaging that is tailored to each patient type will not only better educate consumers on payment options specific to their billing needs, but it will maximize the amount collected before sending to collections. Further, targeted messaging should be applied across all points of patient interaction (i.e. point of service, customer service, patient statements) and analyzed regularly for maximized results.
The Future of Online Patient Billing Portals
This white paper, written by Apex President Patrick Maurer, discusses methods to increase patient adoption of online payments. Providers are now seeking ways to incrementally collect more payments due from patients as well as speeding up the rate of collections. This white paper shows why patient-centric approaches to online payment portals are important complements to traditional provider-centric approaches.
Payment Portals Can Improve Self-Pay Collections and Support Meaningful Use
Increased electronic engagement between healthcare providers and patients provides significant opportunities for improving revenue cycle metrics and encouraging patients to access EHRs. This article, written by Apex Founder and CEO Brian Kueppers, explores a number of strategies to create synergy between patient billing, online payment portals and electronic health record (EHR) software to realize a high ROI in speed to payment, patient satisfaction and portal adoption for meaningful use.
Large Health System Drives 10% UP (Patient Payments) and 10% DOWN (Billing-related Costs)
Faced with a rising tide of bad debt, a large Southeastern healthcare system was seeing a sharp decline in net patient revenues. The need to improve collections was dire. By integrating critical tools and processes, the health system was able to increase online payments and improve its financial position. Taking a holistic approach increased overall collection yield by 10% while costs came down because the number of statements sent to patients fell by 10%, which equated to a $1.3M annualized improvement in patient cash over a six-month period. This case study explains how.
ICD-10: Managing Performance
With the ICD10 deadline quickly approaching and daily responsibilities not slowing down, final preparations for October 1 require strategic prioritization and laser focus.
Clarity Drives Collections
Read how Gwinnett Medical Center provides clear connections to financial information, offers multiple payment options for patients, and gives onsite staff the ability to collect payments at multiple points throughout the care process.
Orlando Health Gains Insight into Denials, Reduces A/R Days with RelayAnalytics Acuity
Read how Orlando Health was able to perform deeper dives into claims data to help the health system see claim rejections more quickly–even on the front end–and reduce A/R days.
Revenue Cycle Payment Clarity
To maintain fiscal fitness and boost patient satisfaction and loyalty, healthcare providers need visibility into when and how much they will be paid–by whom–and the ability to better navigate obstacles to payment. They need payment clarity. This whitepaper illuminates this concept that is winning fans at forward-thinking hospitals.
Streamlining the Patient Billing Process
Financial services staff are always looking for ways to improve the verification, billing and collections processes, and Munson Healthcare is no different. Read about how they streamlined the billing process to produce cleaner bills on the front end and helped financial services staff collect more than $1 million in additional upfront annual revenue in one year.
Wallace Thomson Hospital Automates to Maximize Limited Resources
Effective revenue cycle management can be a challenge for any hospital, but for smaller providers it is even tougher. Read how Wallace Thomson identified unreimbursed procedures, streamlined claims management, and improved its ability to determine charity eligibility.
7 Steps for Building and Funding Sustainability Projects
Before launching an energy-efficiency initiative, it’s important to build a solid business case and understand the funding options and potential incentives that are available. Healthcare leaders should consider taking the steps outlined in the whitepaper to ease the process of gaining approval, piloting, implementing, and supporting sustainability projects. You will find that investing in sustainability and energy efficiency helps hospitals add cash to their bottom line. Discover how hospitals and health systems have various options for funding energy-efficient and renewable-energy initiatives, depending on their current financial structure and strategy.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
Health care is a dynamic mergers and acquisitions market with numerous hospitals and health systems contemplating or pursuing formal arrangements with other entities. These relationships often pose a strategic benefit, such as enhancing competencies across the continuum, facilitating economies of scale, or giving the participants a competitive advantage in a crowded market. Underpinning any profitable acquisition is a robust capital planning strategy that ensures an organization reserves sufficient funds and efficiently onboards partners that advance the enterprise mission and values.
Key Capital Considerations for Mergers and Acquisitions
The success of healthcare mergers, acquisitions, and other affiliations is predicated in part on available capital, and the need for and sources of funding are considerations present throughout the partnering process, from choosing a partner to evaluating an arrangement’s capital needs to selecting an integration model to finding the right money source to finance the deal. This whitepaper offers several strategies that health system leaders have used to assess and manage capital needs for their growing networks.
Trend Watch: Providers adapt as value-based care moves from hype to reality
Announcements from several commercial payers and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) early in 2015 around increased efforts to form value-based contracts with providers seemed to point to an impending rise in risk-based contracting. Rather than wait for disruption from the outside in, health care providers are now making inroads on collaborating with payers on various risk-based contracting models to increase the value of health care from within.
Yuma Regional Medical Center case study
Yuma Regional Medical Center (YRMC) is a not-for-profit hospital serving a population of roughly 200,000 in Yuma and the surrounding communities.
Before becoming a ZirMed client, Yuma was attempting to manually monitor hundreds of thousands of charges which led to significant charge capture leakage. Learn how Yuma & ZirMed worked together to address underlying collections issues at the front end, thus increasing Yuma’s overall bottom line.
Reforming with a New 50-Bed Acute Care Facility
Kindred Hospital Rehabilitation Services works with partners to audit the market and the facility’s role in that market to identify opportunities for improvement. This approach leads to successes; Kindred’s clinical rehab and management expertise complements our partners’ strengths. Every facility and challenge is unique, and requires a full objective analysis.
5-Minute Briefing on Revenue Integrity Through HIM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
As the critical link between patient care and reimbursement, health information enables more complete and accurate revenue capture. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing shares how to achieve cost-effective revenue integrity by your optimizing HIM systems.
5-Minute Briefing on Accelerating Cash Flow Through HIM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
Speedier cash flow starts with better CDI and coding. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how providers can improve vital measures of technical and business performance to accelerate cash flow.
5-Minute Briefing on Reducing the Cost of RCM WhitePaper Hospitals FS
Qualified coders are getting harder to come by, and even the most seasoned professional can struggle with the complexity of ICD-10. This 5-Minute White Paper Briefing explains how partnerships can help improve coding and other key RCM operations potentially at a cost savings.
Providers Focus Too Much On Revenue Cycle Management
The point of managing your revenue cycle isn’t just to improve revenue and cash flow. It’s to do those things effectively by consistently following best practices— while spending as little time, money, and energy on them as possible.
Lucille Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford Case Study
How Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford increased payments received within 45 days by 20% and reduced paper submission claims by 70% by using ZirMed solutions.
Using Predictive Modeling To Detect Meaningful Correlations Across Claims Denials Data
The reasons claims are denied are so varied that managing denials can feel like chasing a thousand different tails. This situation is not surprising given that a hypothetical denial rate of just 5 percent translates to tens of thousands of denied claims per year for large hospitals—where real‐world denial rates often range from 12 to 22 percent. Read about how predictive modeling can detect meaningful correlations across claims denials data.
ZOLL and Emergency Mobile Health Care Case Study
Emergency Mobile Health Care (EMHC) was founded to be and remains an exclusively locally owned and operated emergency medical service organization; today EMHC serves a population of more than a million people in and around Memphis, answering 75,000 calls each year.
Maximizing Medicare Reimbursements White Paper
Since the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) introduction, CMS has paid more than $100 million in bonus payments to participants. However, these bonuses ended in 2015; providers who successfully meet the reporting requirements in 2016 will avoid the 2% negative payment adjustment in 2018, so now is the time to act! Included in this whitepaper are implications of increasing patient responsibility, collections best practices, and collections and internal control solutions.
Denials Deconstructed: Getting Your Claims Paid
Getting paid what your physician deserves—that’s the goal of every biller. Yet even for the best billers, achieving that success can be elusive when denials stand in the way of success, presenting challenges at every turn. Denials aren’t going away, but you can learn techniques to manage and even prevent them.Join practice management expert Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC, to: Discover methods to translate denial data into business intelligence to improve your bottom line, determine staff productivity benchmarks for billers, and recognize common mistakes in denial management.
Automation and Operational Improvement Drive Sustainable Results
Physician practices must improve organizational efficiency to compete in this era of reduced reimbursement and escalating administrative costs.
Revenue Cycle Management Resolves Migration Implementation Issues
Many healthcare organizations are pursuing next-generation health information systems solutions. Learn more about Navigant's work with University of Michigan Health System.
Partnering For Success – Provider Achieves Strength in Stability
The proper implementation of healthcare information technology systems is crucial to an organization’s financial health.
Building a Clinically-Integrated Network
As value-based payment models evolve, providers are challenged to maintain superior clinical outcomes while controlling costs.
Winning in the Post-Acute Marketplace
Read more about factors contributing to the changes in the post-acute marketplace and what it means for manufacturers, physicians, clinicians, patients, and post-acute facilities as they anticipate the transition to the second curve.
Building A Common Vision with Employed Physicians
HSG helped the physicians and executives of St. Claire Regional in Morehead, Kentucky, define their shared vision for how the group would evolve over the next decade. As well as, develop the strategic and operational priorities which refocused and accelerated the group’s evolution.
Practice Performance Improvement
The client was a nine-hospital health system with 14 clinics serving communities in a multi-state market with very limited access to care, poor economic conditions, high unemployment, and a heavy Medicare/Medicaid/uninsured payer mix. In most of these communities, the system was the sole source of care.
Though the clinics were of substantial size (they employed 98 physicians) and comprised of multiple specialists, the physicians functioned as individuals and the practices lacked any real group culture.
Clinical Integration Without Spending a Fortune
Clinical integration can be expensive, but it doesn’t have to be, as this four-step road map for developing a CIN proves. Does it have to cost millions to initiate a clinical integration strategy?
Contrary to popular belief, we have clients who have generated substantial shared savings and a significant ROI over time, without massive investments. Yes, some financial capital is required for resources the CIN providers can’t bring to the table themselves. But the size of that investment can be miniscule relative to the value it produces: improved outcomes and documentation for payers.
Adding Value to Physician Compensation
Today’s concerns about physician compensation are the result of the changing healthcare environment. The transition to value is slow, but finally becoming a reality. Proactive hospitals want to ensure that provider incentives are properly aligned with ever-increasing value-based demands.
This report focuses on the three big questions HSG receives about adding value to physician compensation; Why are organizations redesigning their provider compensation plans? What elements and parameters must be part of successful compensation plans? How are organizations implementing compensation changes?
Effective Revenue Cycle Management in Your Network
Revenue Cycle Management has become an even more complex issue with declining reimbursements, implementation of Electronic Health Records, evolving local carrier determinations (LCD), and payer credentialing [The emphasis on healthcare fraud, abuse and compliance has increased the importance of accuracy of data reporting and claims filing).
The efficiency of a medical practice’s billing operations has critical impact on the financial performance. In many cases, patient billings are the primary revenue source that pays staff salaries, provider compensation and overhead operating cost. Inefficiencies or inaccurate billing will contribute to operating losses.
Succeeding in Value-Based Care
This publication identifies and outlines the necessary characteristics of a fully-functioning clinically integrated network (CIN). What it doesn’t do is detail how hospitals and providers can participate in the value-based care environment during the development process.
One common misconception is that the CIN can’t do anything significant until it has obtained the FTC’s “clinically integrated” stamp of approval. While the network must satisfy the FTC’s definition of clinical integration before single signature contracting for FFS rates and contracts can legally start, hospitals and providers can enjoy three key benefits during the development process.
Therapy: Benefits at All Levels of Care
Nearly half of all Medicare beneficiaries treated in the hospital will need post-acute care services after discharge. For these patients, a stay in an inpatient rehabilitation facility, skilled nursing facility or other post-acute care setting comes between hospital and home.
Does Your Budgeting Process Lack Accountability?
With the proper process, tools, and feedback mechanisms in place, budgeting can be a valuable exercise for organizations while helping hold organizational leaders accountable. Having a proper monthly variance review process is one of the most critical factors in creating a more efficient and accurate budget. Monthly variance reporting puts parameters around what is to be expected during the upcoming budget entry process.
Cost Accounting: the Key to Cost Management and Profitability
Managing the cost of patient care is the top strategic priority of most hospital CFOs today. As healthcare shifts to more data-driven decision making, having clear visibility into key volume, cost and profitability measures across clinical service lines is becoming increasingly important for both long-range and tactical planning activities. In turn, the cost accounting function in healthcare provider organizations is becoming an increasingly important and strategic function. This whitepaper includes five strategies for efficient and accurate cost accounting and service line analytics and keys to overcoming the associated challenges.